Yatırımcı.AI

KIH vs KLS Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KIH (Kare Portföy İstatistiksel Arbitraj Serbest Fon) and KLS (Allbatross Portföy Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

KIHKLS
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

KIH vs KLS Fund Comparison
MetricKIHKLSCategory median
Daily2.50%−0.11%0.06%
1 week2.98%−1.11%0.56%
1 month6.11%−3.53%1.84%
3 months11.91%−6.37%3.29%
6 months22.44%−5.48%7.90%
YTD36.20%−7.31%17.53%
1 year40.15%−5.76%21.48%
Returns are based on prices as of November 12, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the KIH vs KLS Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of KIH (Kare Portföy İstatistiksel Arbitraj Serbest Fon) and KLS (Allbatross Portföy Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, KIH leads in 10 and KLS leads in 0. KIH is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Kare Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; KLS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Allbatross Portföy Yönetimi Anonim Şirketi.

Highlights: Daily: KIH leads (2.50% vs −0.11%). 1 week: KIH leads (2.98% vs −1.11%). 1 month: KIH leads (6.11% vs −3.53%). 3 months: KIH leads (11.91% vs −6.37%). 6 months: KIH leads (22.44% vs −5.48%). YTD: KIH leads (36.20% vs −7.31%). 1 year: KIH leads (40.15% vs −5.76%). Size (TRY): KIH leads (563K vs 201.2K). Investors: KIH leads (19 vs 1). Risk: KIH leads (2 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date KIH returned 36.20% and KLS returned −7.31%; over the last year KIH returned 40.15% and KLS returned −5.76%. Over the last month KIH returned 6.11% and KLS returned −3.53%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 12, 2026, KIH has a size of TRY 563K with 19 investors, while KLS has a size of TRY 201.2K with 1 investors. KIH leads in size and KIH leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of KIH is 2 out of 7 and that of KLS is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.