Yatırımcı.AI

KLS vs SHU Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KLS (Allbatross Portföy Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and SHU (Sparta Portföy Üçüncü Hisse Senedi Serbest (TL) Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) side by side.

KLSSHU
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

KLS vs SHU Fund Comparison
MetricKLSSHUCategory median
Today (est.)—−3.54%−2.71%
Daily−0.12%−0.47%0.05%
1 week−0.74%−3.13%0.44%
1 month−3.23%−24.67%0.38%
3 months−3.30%−35.70%3.95%
6 months−3.04%−37.83%8.45%
YTD−4.86%−9.20%16.06%
1 year−2.49%—20.98%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Oct 22, 2026, 22:16.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the KLS vs SHU Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of KLS (Allbatross Portföy Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and SHU (Sparta Portföy Üçüncü Hisse Senedi Serbest (TL) Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, KLS leads in 8 and SHU leads in 0. KLS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Allbatross Portföy Yönetimi Anonim Şirketi; SHU is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Sparta Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: KLS leads (−0.12% vs −0.47%). 1 week: KLS leads (−0.74% vs −3.13%). 1 month: KLS leads (−3.23% vs −24.67%). 3 months: KLS leads (−3.30% vs −35.70%). 6 months: KLS leads (−3.04% vs −37.83%). YTD: KLS leads (−4.86% vs −9.20%). Size (TRY): KLS leads (206.5K vs 2.4K). Risk: KLS leads (6 vs 7).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date KLS returned −4.86% and SHU returned −9.20%; over the last year KLS returned −2.49% and SHU returned —. Over the last month KLS returned −3.23% and SHU returned −24.67%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, KLS has a size of TRY 206.5K with 1 investors, while SHU has a size of TRY 2.4K with 1 investors. KLS leads in size and Tie leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of KLS is 6 out of 7 and that of SHU is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.