FSP vs KLS Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FSP (Fonmap Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and KLS (Allbatross Portföy Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | FSP | KLS | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.27% | −0.47% | 0.19% |
| 1 week | −0.31% | −0.64% | 0.42% |
| 1 month | −20.44% | −1.87% | 0.94% |
| 3 months | −44.88% | −0.09% | 5.89% |
| 6 months | −55.64% | −1.01% | 12.86% |
| YTD | −57.72% | −2.47% | 18.07% |
| 1 year | −58.90% | 1.39% | 24.44% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the FSP vs KLS comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of FSP (Fonmap Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and KLS (Allbatross Portföy Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, FSP leads in 3 and KLS leads in 6. FSP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fonmap Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; KLS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Allbatross Portföy Yönetimi Anonim Şirketi.
Highlights: Daily: FSP leads (−0.27% vs −0.47%). 1 week: FSP leads (−0.31% vs −0.64%). 1 month: KLS leads (−1.87% vs −20.44%). 3 months: KLS leads (−0.09% vs −44.88%). 6 months: KLS leads (−1.01% vs −55.64%). YTD: KLS leads (−2.47% vs −57.72%). 1 year: KLS leads (1.39% vs −58.90%). Size (TRY): KLS leads (211.7K vs 96.4K). Investors: FSP leads (15 vs 1).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, FSP or KLS?
Year to date FSP returned −57.72% and KLS returned −2.47%; over the last year FSP returned −58.90% and KLS returned 1.39%. Over the last month FSP returned −20.44% and KLS returned −1.87%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, FSP or KLS?
As of September 28, 2026, FSP has a size of TRY 96.4K with 15 investors, while KLS has a size of TRY 211.7K with 1 investors. KLS leads in size and FSP leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of FSP and KLS mean?
The CMB risk score of FSP is 6 out of 7 and that of KLS is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.