Yatırımcı.AI

KGM vs YAN Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KGM (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Gümüş Katılım Fon Sepeti Fonu) and YAN (Yapı Kredi Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.

KGMYAN
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

KGM vs YAN Fund Comparison
MetricKGMYANCategory median
Daily−6.89%−0.47%−1.33%
1 week−6.64%−0.10%−0.68%
1 month−15.75%0.14%−2.96%
3 months−8.40%6.59%0.00%
6 months−22.55%14.93%2.05%
YTD−22.21%26.97%17.79%
1 year18.82%34.26%24.45%
3 years—135.81%158.82%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the KGM vs YAN Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of KGM (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Gümüş Katılım Fon Sepeti Fonu) and YAN (Yapı Kredi Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, KGM leads in 2 and YAN leads in 8. KGM is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Kuveyt Türk Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; YAN is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: YAN leads (−0.47% vs −6.89%). 1 week: YAN leads (−0.10% vs −6.64%). 1 month: YAN leads (0.14% vs −15.75%). 3 months: YAN leads (6.59% vs −8.40%). 6 months: YAN leads (14.93% vs −22.55%). YTD: YAN leads (26.97% vs −22.21%). 1 year: YAN leads (34.26% vs 18.82%). Size (TRY): KGM leads (2.2B vs 1.9B). Investors: KGM leads (27,630 vs 3,457). Risk: YAN leads (4 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date KGM returned −22.21% and YAN returned 26.97%; over the last year KGM returned 18.82% and YAN returned 34.26%. Over the last month KGM returned −15.75% and YAN returned 0.14%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, KGM has a size of TRY 2.2B with 27,630 investors, while YAN has a size of TRY 1.9B with 3,457 investors. KGM leads in size and KGM leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of KGM is 6 out of 7 and that of YAN is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.