Yatırımcı.AI

KGM vs OTJ Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KGM (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Gümüş Katılım Fon Sepeti Fonu) and OTJ (Oyak Portföy Kıymetli Madenler Katılım Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.

KGMOTJ
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

KGM vs OTJ Fund Comparison
MetricKGMOTJCategory median
Daily0.80%1.00%0.38%
1 week−3.30%−1.86%0.25%
1 month−4.91%−3.88%−1.05%
3 months13.54%11.55%6.44%
6 months1.02%2.85%13.81%
YTD−1.19%3.04%22.40%
1 year60.17%42.46%35.81%
3 years—275.22%175.03%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the KGM vs OTJ comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of KGM (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Gümüş Katılım Fon Sepeti Fonu) and OTJ (Oyak Portföy Kıymetli Madenler Katılım Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, KGM leads in 3 and OTJ leads in 6. KGM is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Kuveyt Türk Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; OTJ is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Oyak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: OTJ leads (1.00% vs 0.80%). 1 week: OTJ leads (−1.86% vs −3.30%). 1 month: OTJ leads (−3.88% vs −4.91%). 3 months: KGM leads (13.54% vs 11.55%). 6 months: OTJ leads (2.85% vs 1.02%). YTD: OTJ leads (3.04% vs −1.19%). 1 year: KGM leads (60.17% vs 42.46%). Size (TRY): OTJ leads (3B vs 2.8B). Investors: KGM leads (29,413 vs 19,811).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date KGM returned −1.19% and OTJ returned 3.04%; over the last year KGM returned 60.17% and OTJ returned 42.46%. Over the last month KGM returned −4.91% and OTJ returned −3.88%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, KGM has a size of TRY 2.8B with 29,413 investors, while OTJ has a size of TRY 3B with 19,811 investors. OTJ leads in size and KGM leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of KGM is 6 out of 7 and that of OTJ is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.