Yatırımcı.AI

DMG vs KGM Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of DMG (Deniz Portföy Gümüş Fon Sepeti Fonu) and KGM (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Gümüş Katılım Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.

DMGKGM
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

DMG vs KGM Fund Comparison
MetricDMGKGMCategory median
Daily0.83%0.80%0.38%
1 week−2.99%−3.30%0.25%
1 month−4.63%−4.91%−1.05%
3 months13.87%13.54%6.44%
6 months1.73%1.02%13.81%
YTD−0.79%−1.19%22.40%
1 year61.34%60.17%35.81%
3 years355.71%—175.03%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the DMG vs KGM comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of DMG (Deniz Portföy Gümüş Fon Sepeti Fonu) and KGM (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Gümüş Katılım Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, DMG leads in 8 and KGM leads in 2. DMG is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.ş; KGM is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Kuveyt Türk Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: DMG leads (0.83% vs 0.80%). 1 week: DMG leads (−2.99% vs −3.30%). 1 month: DMG leads (−4.63% vs −4.91%). 3 months: DMG leads (13.87% vs 13.54%). 6 months: DMG leads (1.73% vs 1.02%). YTD: DMG leads (−0.79% vs −1.19%). 1 year: DMG leads (61.34% vs 60.17%). Size (TRY): DMG leads (2.9B vs 2.8B). Investors: KGM leads (29,413 vs 14,357). Risk: KGM leads (6 vs 7).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date DMG returned −0.79% and KGM returned −1.19%; over the last year DMG returned 61.34% and KGM returned 60.17%. Over the last month DMG returned −4.63% and KGM returned −4.91%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, DMG has a size of TRY 2.9B with 14,357 investors, while KGM has a size of TRY 2.8B with 29,413 investors. DMG leads in size and KGM leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of DMG is 7 out of 7 and that of KGM is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.