Yatırımcı.AI

GAS vs KDT Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GAS (Garanti Portföy Üçüncü Serbest(döviz) Fon) and KDT (Garanti Portföy Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

GASKDT
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GAS vs KDT Fund Comparison
MetricGASKDTCategory median
Daily−0.01%0.06%0.19%
1 week0.19%0.24%0.42%
1 month1.03%1.31%0.94%
3 months5.11%5.64%5.89%
6 months12.23%12.90%12.86%
YTD15.26%16.02%18.07%
1 year21.46%22.54%24.44%
3 years109.72%22.99%111.64%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GAS vs KDT Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GAS (Garanti Portföy Üçüncü Serbest(döviz) Fon) and KDT (Garanti Portföy Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, GAS leads in 2 and KDT leads in 8. GAS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; KDT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: KDT leads (0.06% vs −0.01%). 1 week: KDT leads (0.24% vs 0.19%). 1 month: KDT leads (1.31% vs 1.03%). 3 months: KDT leads (5.64% vs 5.11%). 6 months: KDT leads (12.90% vs 12.23%). YTD: KDT leads (16.02% vs 15.26%). 1 year: KDT leads (22.54% vs 21.46%). 3 years: GAS leads (109.72% vs 22.99%). Size (TRY): KDT leads (3.2B vs 3.2B). Investors: GAS leads (2,188 vs 1,138).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GAS returned 15.26% and KDT returned 16.02%; over the last year GAS returned 21.46% and KDT returned 22.54%. Over the last month GAS returned 1.03% and KDT returned 1.31%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, GAS has a size of TRY 3.2B with 2,188 investors, while KDT has a size of TRY 3.2B with 1,138 investors. KDT leads in size and GAS leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GAS is 0 out of 7 and that of KDT is 0. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.