Yatırımcı.AI

CKF vs KTM Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of CKF (Albaraka Portföy Çoklu Varlık Katılım Fonu) and KTM (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Birinci Katılım (TL) Fonu) side by side.

CKFKTM
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

CKF vs KTM Fund Comparison
MetricCKFKTMCategory median
Daily0.99%0.53%0.29%
1 week1.52%−0.36%0.41%
1 month0.49%−2.66%0.20%
3 months8.55%4.40%8.83%
6 months35.77%17.35%16.56%
YTD40.96%29.62%27.81%
1 year53.85%39.03%39.52%
3 years—186.50%172.10%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the CKF vs KTM comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of CKF (Albaraka Portföy Çoklu Varlık Katılım Fonu) and KTM (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Birinci Katılım (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, CKF leads in 8 and KTM leads in 2. CKF is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Albaraka Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; KTM is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Kuveyt Türk Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: CKF leads (0.99% vs 0.53%). 1 week: CKF leads (1.52% vs −0.36%). 1 month: CKF leads (0.49% vs −2.66%). 3 months: CKF leads (8.55% vs 4.40%). 6 months: CKF leads (35.77% vs 17.35%). YTD: CKF leads (40.96% vs 29.62%). 1 year: CKF leads (53.85% vs 39.03%). Size (TRY): CKF leads (682.8M vs 659M). Investors: KTM leads (5,760 vs 2,683). Risk: KTM leads (3 vs 5).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date CKF returned 40.96% and KTM returned 29.62%; over the last year CKF returned 53.85% and KTM returned 39.03%. Over the last month CKF returned 0.49% and KTM returned −2.66%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, CKF has a size of TRY 682.8M with 2,683 investors, while KTM has a size of TRY 659M with 5,760 investors. CKF leads in size and KTM leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of CKF is 5 out of 7 and that of KTM is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.