Yatırımcı.AI

IRT vs NKP Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of IRT (Inveo Portföy Teknoloji Değişken Fon) and NKP (Neo Portföy Kar Payı Ödeyen Değişken Fon) side by side.

IRTNKP
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

IRT vs NKP Fund Comparison
MetricIRTNKPCategory median
Daily−1.22%−0.75%−0.83%
1 week−0.47%−0.57%−0.98%
1 month−0.71%−1.26%−1.82%
3 months0.84%−3.47%3.78%
6 months43.26%2.48%14.04%
YTD46.10%5.96%24.40%
1 year68.18%11.05%34.17%
3 years275.46%—157.59%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the IRT vs NKP Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of IRT (Inveo Portföy Teknoloji Değişken Fon) and NKP (Neo Portföy Kar Payı Ödeyen Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, IRT leads in 6 and NKP leads in 4. IRT is a Variable Fund fund managed by Inveo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NKP is a Variable Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: NKP leads (−0.75% vs −1.22%). 1 week: IRT leads (−0.47% vs −0.57%). 1 month: IRT leads (−0.71% vs −1.26%). 3 months: IRT leads (0.84% vs −3.47%). 6 months: IRT leads (43.26% vs 2.48%). YTD: IRT leads (46.10% vs 5.96%). 1 year: IRT leads (68.18% vs 11.05%). Size (TRY): NKP leads (125.2M vs 120.8M). Investors: NKP leads (2,714 vs 1,345). Risk: NKP leads (5 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date IRT returned 46.10% and NKP returned 5.96%; over the last year IRT returned 68.18% and NKP returned 11.05%. Over the last month IRT returned −0.71% and NKP returned −1.26%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, IRT has a size of TRY 120.8M with 1,345 investors, while NKP has a size of TRY 125.2M with 2,714 investors. NKP leads in size and NKP leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of IRT is 6 out of 7 and that of NKP is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.