MD2 vs NKP Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of MD2 (MT Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) and NKP (Neo Portföy Kar Payı Ödeyen Değişken Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | MD2 | NKP | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −1.19% | −0.75% | −0.83% |
| 1 week | −5.92% | −0.57% | −0.98% |
| 1 month | −10.16% | −1.26% | −1.82% |
| 3 months | 1.16% | −3.47% | 3.78% |
| 6 months | 10.86% | 2.48% | 14.04% |
| YTD | 29.39% | 5.96% | 24.40% |
| 1 year | 47.60% | 11.05% | 34.17% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the MD2 vs NKP Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of MD2 (MT Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) and NKP (Neo Portföy Kar Payı Ödeyen Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, MD2 leads in 5 and NKP leads in 5. MD2 is a Variable Fund fund managed by MT Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NKP is a Variable Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: NKP leads (−0.75% vs −1.19%). 1 week: NKP leads (−0.57% vs −5.92%). 1 month: NKP leads (−1.26% vs −10.16%). 3 months: MD2 leads (1.16% vs −3.47%). 6 months: MD2 leads (10.86% vs 2.48%). YTD: MD2 leads (29.39% vs 5.96%). 1 year: MD2 leads (47.60% vs 11.05%). Size (TRY): NKP leads (125.2M vs 121.9M). Investors: NKP leads (2,714 vs 367). Risk: MD2 leads (4 vs 5).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, MD2 or NKP?
Year to date MD2 returned 29.39% and NKP returned 5.96%; over the last year MD2 returned 47.60% and NKP returned 11.05%. Over the last month MD2 returned −10.16% and NKP returned −1.26%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, MD2 or NKP?
As of September 29, 2026, MD2 has a size of TRY 121.9M with 367 investors, while NKP has a size of TRY 125.2M with 2,714 investors. NKP leads in size and NKP leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of MD2 and NKP mean?
The CMB risk score of MD2 is 4 out of 7 and that of NKP is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.