Yatırımcı.AI

IPG vs IRF Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of IPG (İş Portföy Atak Fon Sepeti Fonu) and IRF (İstanbul Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.

IPGIRF
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

IPG vs IRF Fund Comparison
MetricIPGIRFCategory median
Daily−0.91%−0.09%−0.33%
1 week−0.95%−16.23%−0.80%
1 month0.48%−15.64%−2.70%
3 months4.25%−10.08%1.63%
6 months8.25%2.41%4.14%
YTD16.68%17.59%20.92%
1 year28.59%27.90%30.34%
3 years159.79%168.16%165.29%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the IPG vs IRF Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of IPG (İş Portföy Atak Fon Sepeti Fonu) and IRF (İstanbul Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, IPG leads in 7 and IRF leads in 4. IPG is a Fund of Funds fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; IRF is a Fund of Funds fund managed by İstanbul Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: IRF leads (−0.09% vs −0.91%). 1 week: IPG leads (−0.95% vs −16.23%). 1 month: IPG leads (0.48% vs −15.64%). 3 months: IPG leads (4.25% vs −10.08%). 6 months: IPG leads (8.25% vs 2.41%). YTD: IRF leads (17.59% vs 16.68%). 1 year: IPG leads (28.59% vs 27.90%). 3 years: IRF leads (168.16% vs 159.79%). Size (TRY): IPG leads (351.3M vs 280.2M). Investors: IPG leads (1,584 vs 1,327). Risk: IRF leads (3 vs 5).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date IPG returned 16.68% and IRF returned 17.59%; over the last year IPG returned 28.59% and IRF returned 27.90%. Over the last month IPG returned 0.48% and IRF returned −15.64%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, IPG has a size of TRY 351.3M with 1,584 investors, while IRF has a size of TRY 280.2M with 1,327 investors. IPG leads in size and IPG leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of IPG is 5 out of 7 and that of IRF is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.