IOG vs UNT Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of IOG (İş Portföy Gümüş Serbest Fon) and UNT (İş Portföy Üçüncü Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | IOG | UNT | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.77% | 0.29% | 0.19% |
| 1 week | −2.98% | 0.68% | 0.42% |
| 1 month | −4.49% | 3.07% | 0.94% |
| 3 months | 13.16% | 9.80% | 5.89% |
| 6 months | 1.87% | 21.29% | 12.86% |
| YTD | −3.58% | 32.00% | 18.07% |
| 1 year | 56.03% | 45.94% | 24.44% |
| 3 years | 368.40% | — | 111.64% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the IOG vs UNT comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of IOG (İş Portföy Gümüş Serbest Fon) and UNT (İş Portföy Üçüncü Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, IOG leads in 5 and UNT leads in 5. IOG is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; UNT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: IOG leads (0.77% vs 0.29%). 1 week: UNT leads (0.68% vs −2.98%). 1 month: UNT leads (3.07% vs −4.49%). 3 months: IOG leads (13.16% vs 9.80%). 6 months: UNT leads (21.29% vs 1.87%). YTD: UNT leads (32.00% vs −3.58%). 1 year: IOG leads (56.03% vs 45.94%). Size (TRY): IOG leads (11.9B vs 11.7B). Investors: IOG leads (17,613 vs 291). Risk: UNT leads (2 vs 7).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, IOG or UNT?
Year to date IOG returned −3.58% and UNT returned 32.00%; over the last year IOG returned 56.03% and UNT returned 45.94%. Over the last month IOG returned −4.49% and UNT returned 3.07%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, IOG or UNT?
As of September 28, 2026, IOG has a size of TRY 11.9B with 17,613 investors, while UNT has a size of TRY 11.7B with 291 investors. IOG leads in size and IOG leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of IOG and UNT mean?
The CMB risk score of IOG is 7 out of 7 and that of UNT is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.