IDF vs UNT Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of IDF (İş Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and UNT (İş Portföy Üçüncü Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | IDF | UNT | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.25% | 0.29% | 0.19% |
| 1 week | 0.41% | 0.68% | 0.42% |
| 1 month | 1.13% | 3.07% | 0.94% |
| 3 months | 5.44% | 9.80% | 5.89% |
| 6 months | 12.99% | 21.29% | 12.86% |
| YTD | 16.48% | 32.00% | 18.07% |
| 1 year | 23.49% | 45.94% | 24.44% |
| 3 years | 124.28% | — | 111.64% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the IDF vs UNT comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of IDF (İş Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and UNT (İş Portföy Üçüncü Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, IDF leads in 3 and UNT leads in 7. IDF is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; UNT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: UNT leads (0.29% vs 0.25%). 1 week: UNT leads (0.68% vs 0.41%). 1 month: UNT leads (3.07% vs 1.13%). 3 months: UNT leads (9.80% vs 5.44%). 6 months: UNT leads (21.29% vs 12.99%). YTD: UNT leads (32.00% vs 16.48%). 1 year: UNT leads (45.94% vs 23.49%). Size (TRY): IDF leads (12.4B vs 11.7B). Investors: IDF leads (4,125 vs 291). Risk: IDF leads (0 vs 2).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, IDF or UNT?
Year to date IDF returned 16.48% and UNT returned 32.00%; over the last year IDF returned 23.49% and UNT returned 45.94%. Over the last month IDF returned 1.13% and UNT returned 3.07%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, IDF or UNT?
As of September 28, 2026, IDF has a size of TRY 12.4B with 4,125 investors, while UNT has a size of TRY 11.7B with 291 investors. IDF leads in size and IDF leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of IDF and UNT mean?
The CMB risk score of IDF is 0 out of 7 and that of UNT is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.