FMG vs UNT Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FMG (Qnb Portföy Gümüş Serbest Fon) and UNT (İş Portföy Üçüncü Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | FMG | UNT | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.07% | 0.29% | 0.19% |
| 1 week | −3.62% | 0.68% | 0.42% |
| 1 month | −5.70% | 3.07% | 0.94% |
| 3 months | 14.99% | 9.80% | 5.89% |
| 6 months | −1.10% | 21.29% | 12.86% |
| YTD | −2.60% | 32.00% | 18.07% |
| 1 year | 57.47% | 45.94% | 24.44% |
| 3 years | 38.30% | — | 111.64% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the FMG vs UNT Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of FMG (Qnb Portföy Gümüş Serbest Fon) and UNT (İş Portföy Üçüncü Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FMG leads in 4 and UNT leads in 6. FMG is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Qnb Finans Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; UNT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: UNT leads (0.29% vs 0.07%). 1 week: UNT leads (0.68% vs −3.62%). 1 month: UNT leads (3.07% vs −5.70%). 3 months: FMG leads (14.99% vs 9.80%). 6 months: UNT leads (21.29% vs −1.10%). YTD: UNT leads (32.00% vs −2.60%). 1 year: FMG leads (57.47% vs 45.94%). Size (TRY): FMG leads (11.8B vs 11.7B). Investors: FMG leads (9,660 vs 291). Risk: UNT leads (2 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, FMG or UNT?
Year to date FMG returned −2.60% and UNT returned 32.00%; over the last year FMG returned 57.47% and UNT returned 45.94%. Over the last month FMG returned −5.70% and UNT returned 3.07%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, FMG or UNT?
As of September 28, 2026, FMG has a size of TRY 11.8B with 9,660 investors, while UNT has a size of TRY 11.7B with 291 investors. FMG leads in size and FMG leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of FMG and UNT mean?
The CMB risk score of FMG is 6 out of 7 and that of UNT is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.