Yatırımcı.AI

ILZ vs NBO Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ILZ (İş Portföy Temkinli Fon Sepeti Fonu) and NBO (Neo Portföy Borçlanma Aracı Fonları Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.

ILZNBO
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

ILZ vs NBO Fund Comparison
MetricILZNBOCategory median
Daily−0.44%0.10%−0.33%
1 week−0.37%0.70%−0.80%
1 month1.66%2.97%−2.70%
3 months7.81%9.82%1.63%
6 months13.89%21.45%4.14%
YTD19.70%39.07%20.92%
1 year35.00%49.98%30.34%
3 years219.24%—165.29%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the ILZ vs NBO Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of ILZ (İş Portföy Temkinli Fon Sepeti Fonu) and NBO (Neo Portföy Borçlanma Aracı Fonları Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, ILZ leads in 1 and NBO leads in 8. ILZ is a Fund of Funds fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NBO is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: NBO leads (0.10% vs −0.44%). 1 week: NBO leads (0.70% vs −0.37%). 1 month: NBO leads (2.97% vs 1.66%). 3 months: NBO leads (9.82% vs 7.81%). 6 months: NBO leads (21.45% vs 13.89%). YTD: NBO leads (39.07% vs 19.70%). 1 year: NBO leads (49.98% vs 35.00%). Size (TRY): NBO leads (1.3B vs 1B). Investors: ILZ leads (6,022 vs 284).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date ILZ returned 19.70% and NBO returned 39.07%; over the last year ILZ returned 35.00% and NBO returned 49.98%. Over the last month ILZ returned 1.66% and NBO returned 2.97%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, ILZ has a size of TRY 1B with 6,022 investors, while NBO has a size of TRY 1.3B with 284 investors. NBO leads in size and ILZ leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of ILZ is 2 out of 7 and that of NBO is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.