Yatırımcı.AI

IKP vs ITP Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of IKP (İş Portföy Yenilenebilir Enerji Karma Fon) and ITP (İş Portföy Teknoloji Karma Fon) side by side.

IKPITP
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

IKP vs ITP Fund Comparison
MetricIKPITPCategory median
Daily0.62%0.95%0.23%
1 week−0.64%2.34%0.30%
1 month−2.08%2.50%−0.93%
3 months−2.63%9.25%5.83%
6 months14.20%36.08%16.48%
YTD30.94%38.15%23.74%
1 year44.16%46.95%34.62%
3 years210.88%281.11%170.52%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the IKP vs ITP comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of IKP (İş Portföy Yenilenebilir Enerji Karma Fon) and ITP (İş Portföy Teknoloji Karma Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, IKP leads in 1 and ITP leads in 9. IKP is a Mixed Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ITP is a Mixed Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ITP leads (0.95% vs 0.62%). 1 week: ITP leads (2.34% vs −0.64%). 1 month: ITP leads (2.50% vs −2.08%). 3 months: ITP leads (9.25% vs −2.63%). 6 months: ITP leads (36.08% vs 14.20%). YTD: ITP leads (38.15% vs 30.94%). 1 year: ITP leads (46.95% vs 44.16%). 3 years: ITP leads (281.11% vs 210.88%). Size (TRY): ITP leads (1B vs 996.2M). Investors: IKP leads (11,929 vs 10,885).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date IKP returned 30.94% and ITP returned 38.15%; over the last year IKP returned 44.16% and ITP returned 46.95%. Over the last month IKP returned −2.08% and ITP returned 2.50%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, IKP has a size of TRY 996.2M with 11,929 investors, while ITP has a size of TRY 1B with 10,885 investors. ITP leads in size and IKP leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of IKP is 6 out of 7 and that of ITP is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.