Yatırımcı.AI

ITP vs KRM Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ITP (İş Portföy Teknoloji Karma Fon) and KRM (Türkiye Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Katılım Karma Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

ITPKRM
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

ITP vs KRM Fund Comparison
MetricITPKRMCategory median
Daily0.95%0.58%0.23%
1 week2.34%0.47%0.30%
1 month2.50%−0.72%−0.93%
3 months9.25%7.57%5.83%
6 months36.08%24.03%16.48%
YTD38.15%36.98%23.74%
1 year46.95%42.58%34.62%
3 years281.11%28.60%170.52%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the ITP vs KRM comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of ITP (İş Portföy Teknoloji Karma Fon) and KRM (Türkiye Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Katılım Karma Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, ITP leads in 8 and KRM leads in 3. ITP is a Mixed Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; KRM is a Mixed Fund fund managed by Türkiye Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ITP leads (0.95% vs 0.58%). 1 week: ITP leads (2.34% vs 0.47%). 1 month: ITP leads (2.50% vs −0.72%). 3 months: ITP leads (9.25% vs 7.57%). 6 months: ITP leads (36.08% vs 24.03%). YTD: ITP leads (38.15% vs 36.98%). 1 year: ITP leads (46.95% vs 42.58%). 3 years: ITP leads (281.11% vs 28.60%). Size (TRY): KRM leads (1.4B vs 1B). Investors: KRM leads (38,851 vs 10,885). Risk: KRM leads (3 vs 6).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date ITP returned 38.15% and KRM returned 36.98%; over the last year ITP returned 46.95% and KRM returned 42.58%. Over the last month ITP returned 2.50% and KRM returned −0.72%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, ITP has a size of TRY 1B with 10,885 investors, while KRM has a size of TRY 1.4B with 38,851 investors. KRM leads in size and KRM leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of ITP is 6 out of 7 and that of KRM is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.