Yatırımcı.AI

IKP vs IPJ Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of IKP (İş Portföy Yenilenebilir Enerji Karma Fon) and IPJ (İş Portföy Elektrikli Araçlar Karma Fon) side by side.

IKPIPJ
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

IKP vs IPJ Fund Comparison
MetricIKPIPJCategory median
Daily0.62%0.59%0.23%
1 week−0.64%0.78%0.30%
1 month−2.08%−0.47%−0.93%
3 months−2.63%0.98%5.83%
6 months14.20%19.13%16.48%
YTD30.94%30.30%23.74%
1 year44.16%44.82%34.62%
3 years210.88%167.70%170.52%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the IKP vs IPJ comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of IKP (İş Portföy Yenilenebilir Enerji Karma Fon) and IPJ (İş Portföy Elektrikli Araçlar Karma Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, IKP leads in 3 and IPJ leads in 7. IKP is a Mixed Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; IPJ is a Mixed Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: IKP leads (0.62% vs 0.59%). 1 week: IPJ leads (0.78% vs −0.64%). 1 month: IPJ leads (−0.47% vs −2.08%). 3 months: IPJ leads (0.98% vs −2.63%). 6 months: IPJ leads (19.13% vs 14.20%). YTD: IKP leads (30.94% vs 30.30%). 1 year: IPJ leads (44.82% vs 44.16%). 3 years: IKP leads (210.88% vs 167.70%). Size (TRY): IPJ leads (1.2B vs 996.2M). Investors: IPJ leads (17,590 vs 11,929).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date IKP returned 30.94% and IPJ returned 30.30%; over the last year IKP returned 44.16% and IPJ returned 44.82%. Over the last month IKP returned −2.08% and IPJ returned −0.47%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, IKP has a size of TRY 996.2M with 11,929 investors, while IPJ has a size of TRY 1.2B with 17,590 investors. IPJ leads in size and IPJ leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of IKP is 6 out of 7 and that of IPJ is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.