IJT vs ULH Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of IJT (İş Portföy Tarım Serbest Fon) and ULH (Ünlü Portföy Onuncu Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | IJT | ULH | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.79% | −1.91% | 0.01% |
| 1 week | −3.39% | −2.26% | 0.30% |
| 1 month | −4.52% | −4.47% | 0.00% |
| 3 months | −5.16% | 2.16% | 3.96% |
| 6 months | 6.53% | 6.20% | 8.18% |
| YTD | 21.74% | 16.41% | 15.73% |
| 1 year | 23.96% | 17.55% | 20.69% |
| 3 years | 71.10% | 209.27% | 105.65% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the IJT vs ULH Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of IJT (İş Portföy Tarım Serbest Fon) and ULH (Ünlü Portföy Onuncu Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, IJT leads in 6 and ULH leads in 5. IJT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ULH is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ünlü Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: IJT leads (−0.79% vs −1.91%). 1 week: ULH leads (−2.26% vs −3.39%). 1 month: ULH leads (−4.47% vs −4.52%). 3 months: ULH leads (2.16% vs −5.16%). 6 months: IJT leads (6.53% vs 6.20%). YTD: IJT leads (21.74% vs 16.41%). 1 year: IJT leads (23.96% vs 17.55%). 3 years: ULH leads (209.27% vs 71.10%). Size (TRY): ULH leads (1.2B vs 1.2B). Investors: IJT leads (1,467 vs 210). Risk: IJT leads (6 vs 7).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, IJT or ULH?
Year to date IJT returned 21.74% and ULH returned 16.41%; over the last year IJT returned 23.96% and ULH returned 17.55%. Over the last month IJT returned −4.52% and ULH returned −4.47%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, IJT or ULH?
As of October 23, 2026, IJT has a size of TRY 1.2B with 1,467 investors, while ULH has a size of TRY 1.2B with 210 investors. ULH leads in size and IJT leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of IJT and ULH mean?
The CMB risk score of IJT is 6 out of 7 and that of ULH is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.