Yatırımcı.AI

ULH vs YPF Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ULH (Ünlü Portföy Onuncu Serbest Fon) and YPF (Yapı Kredi Portföy Alfa Serbest Fon) side by side.

ULHYPF
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

ULH vs YPF Fund Comparison
MetricULHYPFCategory median
Daily−0.01%−0.19%0.05%
1 week−1.77%−0.84%0.44%
1 month−0.97%−2.04%0.38%
3 months4.14%4.22%3.95%
6 months8.27%13.17%8.45%
YTD18.67%34.56%16.06%
1 year19.18%45.86%20.98%
3 years215.29%161.96%107.86%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the ULH vs YPF Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of ULH (Ünlü Portföy Onuncu Serbest Fon) and YPF (Yapı Kredi Portföy Alfa Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, ULH leads in 3 and YPF leads in 8. ULH is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ünlü Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; YPF is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ULH leads (−0.01% vs −0.19%). 1 week: YPF leads (−0.84% vs −1.77%). 1 month: ULH leads (−0.97% vs −2.04%). 3 months: YPF leads (4.22% vs 4.14%). 6 months: YPF leads (13.17% vs 8.27%). YTD: YPF leads (34.56% vs 18.67%). 1 year: YPF leads (45.86% vs 19.18%). 3 years: ULH leads (215.29% vs 161.96%). Size (TRY): YPF leads (1.2B vs 1.2B). Investors: YPF leads (536 vs 210). Risk: YPF leads (5 vs 7).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date ULH returned 18.67% and YPF returned 34.56%; over the last year ULH returned 19.18% and YPF returned 45.86%. Over the last month ULH returned −0.97% and YPF returned −2.04%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, ULH has a size of TRY 1.2B with 210 investors, while YPF has a size of TRY 1.2B with 536 investors. YPF leads in size and YPF leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of ULH is 7 out of 7 and that of YPF is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.