Yatırımcı.AI

IFV vs MEB Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of IFV (Teb Portföy Birinci Kısa Vadeli Borçlanma Araçları (TL) Fonu) and MEB (Metlife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Borçlanma Araçları Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

IFVMEB
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

IFV vs MEB Fund Comparison
MetricIFVMEBCategory median
Daily0.27%0.22%0.24%
1 week0.69%0.47%0.61%
1 month2.93%1.60%1.60%
3 months9.61%7.97%7.35%
6 months21.03%20.88%18.12%
YTD31.38%19.88%20.27%
1 year45.28%—35.25%
3 years235.77%—164.38%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the IFV vs MEB comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of IFV (Teb Portföy Birinci Kısa Vadeli Borçlanma Araçları (TL) Fonu) and MEB (Metlife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Borçlanma Araçları Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, IFV leads in 8 and MEB leads in 1. IFV is a Debt Instruments Fund fund managed by Teb Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; MEB is a Debt Instruments Fund fund managed by Metlife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: IFV leads (0.27% vs 0.22%). 1 week: IFV leads (0.69% vs 0.47%). 1 month: IFV leads (2.93% vs 1.60%). 3 months: IFV leads (9.61% vs 7.97%). 6 months: IFV leads (21.03% vs 20.88%). YTD: IFV leads (31.38% vs 19.88%). Size (TRY): IFV leads (73.4M vs 72.3M). Investors: MEB leads (4,226 vs 181). Risk: IFV leads (2 vs 3).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date IFV returned 31.38% and MEB returned 19.88%; over the last year IFV returned 45.28% and MEB returned —. Over the last month IFV returned 2.93% and MEB returned 1.60%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, IFV has a size of TRY 73.4M with 181 investors, while MEB has a size of TRY 72.3M with 4,226 investors. IFV leads in size and MEB leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of IFV is 2 out of 7 and that of MEB is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.