CFC vs IFV Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of CFC (Qnb Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Orta Vadeli Borçlanma Araçları Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and IFV (Teb Portföy Birinci Kısa Vadeli Borçlanma Araçları (TL) Fonu) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | CFC | IFV | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.28% | 0.27% | 0.24% |
| 1 week | 0.51% | 0.69% | 0.61% |
| 1 month | 0.92% | 2.93% | 1.60% |
| 3 months | 5.94% | 9.61% | 7.35% |
| 6 months | 16.71% | 21.03% | 18.12% |
| YTD | 19.71% | 31.38% | 20.27% |
| 1 year | 36.37% | 45.28% | 35.25% |
| 3 years | 186.42% | 235.77% | 164.38% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the CFC vs IFV comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of CFC (Qnb Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Orta Vadeli Borçlanma Araçları Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and IFV (Teb Portföy Birinci Kısa Vadeli Borçlanma Araçları (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, CFC leads in 3 and IFV leads in 8. CFC is a Debt Instruments Fund fund managed by Qnb Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; IFV is a Debt Instruments Fund fund managed by Teb Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: CFC leads (0.28% vs 0.27%). 1 week: IFV leads (0.69% vs 0.51%). 1 month: IFV leads (2.93% vs 0.92%). 3 months: IFV leads (9.61% vs 5.94%). 6 months: IFV leads (21.03% vs 16.71%). YTD: IFV leads (31.38% vs 19.71%). 1 year: IFV leads (45.28% vs 36.37%). 3 years: IFV leads (235.77% vs 186.42%). Size (TRY): CFC leads (77.3M vs 73.4M). Investors: CFC leads (316 vs 181). Risk: IFV leads (2 vs 3).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, CFC or IFV?
Year to date CFC returned 19.71% and IFV returned 31.38%; over the last year CFC returned 36.37% and IFV returned 45.28%. Over the last month CFC returned 0.92% and IFV returned 2.93%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, CFC or IFV?
As of September 28, 2026, CFC has a size of TRY 77.3M with 316 investors, while IFV has a size of TRY 73.4M with 181 investors. CFC leads in size and CFC leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of CFC and IFV mean?
The CMB risk score of CFC is 3 out of 7 and that of IFV is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.