Yatırımcı.AI

IFV vs YAE Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of IFV (Teb Portföy Birinci Kısa Vadeli Borçlanma Araçları (TL) Fonu) and YAE (Yapı Kredi Portföy Tlref'e Endeksli Borçlanma Araçları (TL) Fonu) side by side.

IFVYAE
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

IFV vs YAE Fund Comparison
MetricIFVYAECategory median
Daily0.27%0.23%0.24%
1 week0.69%0.66%0.61%
1 month2.93%2.64%1.60%
3 months9.61%9.09%7.35%
6 months21.03%20.21%18.12%
YTD31.38%22.21%20.27%
1 year45.28%—35.25%
3 years235.77%—164.38%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the IFV vs YAE comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of IFV (Teb Portföy Birinci Kısa Vadeli Borçlanma Araçları (TL) Fonu) and YAE (Yapı Kredi Portföy Tlref'e Endeksli Borçlanma Araçları (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, IFV leads in 6 and YAE leads in 2. IFV is a Debt Instruments Fund fund managed by Teb Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; YAE is a Debt Instruments Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: IFV leads (0.27% vs 0.23%). 1 week: IFV leads (0.69% vs 0.66%). 1 month: IFV leads (2.93% vs 2.64%). 3 months: IFV leads (9.61% vs 9.09%). 6 months: IFV leads (21.03% vs 20.21%). YTD: IFV leads (31.38% vs 22.21%). Size (TRY): YAE leads (80.7M vs 73.4M). Investors: YAE leads (577 vs 181).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date IFV returned 31.38% and YAE returned 22.21%; over the last year IFV returned 45.28% and YAE returned —. Over the last month IFV returned 2.93% and YAE returned 2.64%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, IFV has a size of TRY 73.4M with 181 investors, while YAE has a size of TRY 80.7M with 577 investors. YAE leads in size and YAE leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of IFV is 2 out of 7 and that of YAE is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.