CFC vs MEB Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of CFC (QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Orta Vadeli Borçlanma Araçları Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MEB (MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Borçlanma Araçları Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | CFC | MEB | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.05% | 0.01% | 0.05% |
| 1 week | 0.75% | 0.81% | 0.67% |
| 1 month | 2.25% | 2.27% | 2.45% |
| 3 months | 9.26% | 9.12% | 8.53% |
| 6 months | 14.99% | 18.44% | 16.49% |
| YTD | 25.25% | 24.83% | 27.38% |
| 1 year | 36.38% | — | 37.36% |
| 3 years | 189.25% | — | 175.88% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the CFC vs MEB Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of CFC (QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Orta Vadeli Borçlanma Araçları Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MEB (MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Borçlanma Araçları Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, CFC leads in 4 and MEB leads in 4. CFC is a Debt Instruments Fund fund managed by QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; MEB is a Debt Instruments Fund fund managed by MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: CFC leads (0.05% vs 0.01%). 1 week: MEB leads (0.81% vs 0.75%). 1 month: MEB leads (2.27% vs 2.25%). 3 months: CFC leads (9.26% vs 9.12%). 6 months: MEB leads (18.44% vs 14.99%). YTD: CFC leads (25.25% vs 24.83%). Size (TRY): CFC leads (96.4M vs 82.1M). Investors: MEB leads (5,364 vs 337).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, CFC or MEB?
Year to date CFC returned 25.25% and MEB returned 24.83%; over the last year CFC returned 36.38% and MEB returned —. Over the last month CFC returned 2.25% and MEB returned 2.27%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, CFC or MEB?
As of November 12, 2026, CFC has a size of TRY 96.4M with 337 investors, while MEB has a size of TRY 82.1M with 5,364 investors. CFC leads in size and MEB leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of CFC and MEB mean?
The CMB risk score of CFC is 3 out of 7 and that of MEB is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.