Yatırımcı.AI

IDL vs NVB Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of IDL (Aktif Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and NVB (Neo Portföy İkinci Para Piyasası (TL) Fon) side by side.

IDLNVB
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

IDL vs NVB Fund Comparison
MetricIDLNVBCategory median
Daily0.29%0.31%0.29%
1 week0.72%0.73%0.70%
1 month3.07%3.11%3.12%
3 months10.05%9.90%9.98%
6 months21.67%21.47%21.60%
YTD32.28%32.25%32.28%
1 year45.95%46.64%46.56%
3 years257.07%263.97%257.27%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Related Pages

About the IDL vs NVB Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of IDL (Aktif Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and NVB (Neo Portföy İkinci Para Piyasası (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, IDL leads in 4 and NVB leads in 7. IDL is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Aktif Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NVB is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: NVB leads (0.31% vs 0.29%). 1 week: NVB leads (0.73% vs 0.72%). 1 month: NVB leads (3.11% vs 3.07%). 3 months: IDL leads (10.05% vs 9.90%). 6 months: IDL leads (21.67% vs 21.47%). YTD: IDL leads (32.28% vs 32.25%). 1 year: NVB leads (46.64% vs 45.95%). 3 years: NVB leads (263.97% vs 257.07%). Size (TRY): NVB leads (3.6B vs 3.5B). Investors: IDL leads (3,668 vs 3,664). Risk: NVB leads (0 vs 1).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date IDL returned 32.28% and NVB returned 32.25%; over the last year IDL returned 45.95% and NVB returned 46.64%. Over the last month IDL returned 3.07% and NVB returned 3.11%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, IDL has a size of TRY 3.5B with 3,668 investors, while NVB has a size of TRY 3.6B with 3,664 investors. NVB leads in size and IDL leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of IDL is 1 out of 7 and that of NVB is 0. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.