Yatırımcı.AI

IDL vs IJV Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of IDL (Aktif Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and IJV (İstanbul Portföy Birinci Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) side by side.

IDLIJV
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

IDL vs IJV Fund Comparison
MetricIDLIJVCategory median
Daily0.29%0.28%0.29%
1 week0.72%0.68%0.70%
1 month3.07%3.13%3.12%
3 months10.05%10.10%9.98%
6 months21.67%21.60%21.60%
YTD32.28%32.54%32.28%
1 year45.95%46.93%46.56%
3 years257.07%264.55%257.27%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Related Pages

About the IDL vs IJV Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of IDL (Aktif Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and IJV (İstanbul Portföy Birinci Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, IDL leads in 4 and IJV leads in 6. IDL is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Aktif Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; IJV is a Money Market Fund fund managed by İstanbul Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: IDL leads (0.29% vs 0.28%). 1 week: IDL leads (0.72% vs 0.68%). 1 month: IJV leads (3.13% vs 3.07%). 3 months: IJV leads (10.10% vs 10.05%). 6 months: IDL leads (21.67% vs 21.60%). YTD: IJV leads (32.54% vs 32.28%). 1 year: IJV leads (46.93% vs 45.95%). 3 years: IJV leads (264.55% vs 257.07%). Size (TRY): IJV leads (3.6B vs 3.5B). Investors: IDL leads (3,668 vs 2,397).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date IDL returned 32.28% and IJV returned 32.54%; over the last year IDL returned 45.95% and IJV returned 46.93%. Over the last month IDL returned 3.07% and IJV returned 3.13%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, IDL has a size of TRY 3.5B with 3,668 investors, while IJV has a size of TRY 3.6B with 2,397 investors. IJV leads in size and IDL leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of IDL is 1 out of 7 and that of IJV is 1. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.