Yatırımcı.AI

ICS vs PST Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ICS (TEB Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and PST (Pardus Portföy Sanayi Sektörü Dışı Şirketler Hisse Senedi Serbest Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) side by side.

SPK decided to liquidate PST in bulletin 2026/60 dated September 17, 2026; no buy or redemption orders are executed in the fund. Its returns in this comparison are based on the last price published on TEFAS (September 29, 2026). PST fund page · SPK bulletin 2026/60

ICSPST
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

ICS vs PST Fund Comparison
MetricICSPSTCategory median
Daily0.34%−28.85%−0.07%
1 week−0.24%−47.48%−0.29%
1 month1.35%−84.76%0.00%
3 months4.93%−93.90%4.33%
6 months8.11%−92.32%11.90%
YTD12.63%−90.64%14.97%
1 year13.54%−99.68%21.27%
3 years72.91%—111.30%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the ICS vs PST Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of ICS (TEB Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and PST (Pardus Portföy Sanayi Sektörü Dışı Şirketler Hisse Senedi Serbest Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, ICS leads in 9 and PST leads in 0. ICS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by TEB Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PST is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Pardus Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ICS leads (0.34% vs −28.85%). 1 week: ICS leads (−0.24% vs −47.48%). 1 month: ICS leads (1.35% vs −84.76%). 3 months: ICS leads (4.93% vs −93.90%). 6 months: ICS leads (8.11% vs −92.32%). YTD: ICS leads (12.63% vs −90.64%). 1 year: ICS leads (13.54% vs −99.68%). Size (TRY): ICS leads (7.6M vs 7.5M). Investors: ICS leads (50 vs 48).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date ICS returned 12.63% and PST returned −90.64%; over the last year ICS returned 13.54% and PST returned −99.68%. Over the last month ICS returned 1.35% and PST returned −84.76%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, ICS has a size of TRY 7.6M with 50 investors, while PST has a size of TRY 7.5M with 48 investors. ICS leads in size and ICS leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of ICS is — out of 7 and that of PST is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.