Yatırımcı.AI

ICS vs IZS Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ICS (TEB Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and IZS (İstanbul Portföy Altıncı Serbest Fon) side by side.

ICSIZS
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

ICS vs IZS Fund Comparison
MetricICSIZSCategory median
Daily0.01%0.10%0.01%
1 week0.22%0.59%0.30%
1 month0.85%2.69%0.00%
3 months4.54%17.57%3.96%
6 months7.06%27.77%8.18%
YTD13.97%21.02%15.73%
1 year16.36%24.76%20.69%
3 years71.85%146.58%105.65%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the ICS vs IZS Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of ICS (TEB Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and IZS (İstanbul Portföy Altıncı Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, ICS leads in 1 and IZS leads in 9. ICS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by TEB Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; IZS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İstanbul Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: IZS leads (0.10% vs 0.01%). 1 week: IZS leads (0.59% vs 0.22%). 1 month: IZS leads (2.69% vs 0.85%). 3 months: IZS leads (17.57% vs 4.54%). 6 months: IZS leads (27.77% vs 7.06%). YTD: IZS leads (21.02% vs 13.97%). 1 year: IZS leads (24.76% vs 16.36%). 3 years: IZS leads (146.58% vs 71.85%). Size (TRY): IZS leads (11.7M vs 11.4M). Investors: ICS leads (62 vs 52).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date ICS returned 13.97% and IZS returned 21.02%; over the last year ICS returned 16.36% and IZS returned 24.76%. Over the last month ICS returned 0.85% and IZS returned 2.69%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, ICS has a size of TRY 11.4M with 62 investors, while IZS has a size of TRY 11.7M with 52 investors. IZS leads in size and ICS leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of ICS is — out of 7 and that of IZS is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.