Yatırımcı.AI

HVT vs PRH Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of HVT (Allbatross Portföy Birinci Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and PRH (Aura Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) side by side.

HVTPRH
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

HVT vs PRH Fund Comparison
MetricHVTPRHCategory median
Daily0.10%0.10%0.09%
1 week0.72%0.71%0.69%
1 month3.14%1.75%2.97%
3 months10.54%8.31%9.76%
6 months22.39%19.45%20.90%
YTD39.60%33.77%35.49%
1 year51.04%45.27%45.62%
3 years276.00%—255.49%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the HVT vs PRH Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of HVT (Allbatross Portföy Birinci Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and PRH (Aura Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, HVT leads in 8 and PRH leads in 1. HVT is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Allbatross Portföy Yönetimi Anonim Şirketi; PRH is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Aura Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: HVT leads (0.10% vs 0.10%). 1 week: HVT leads (0.72% vs 0.71%). 1 month: HVT leads (3.14% vs 1.75%). 3 months: HVT leads (10.54% vs 8.31%). 6 months: HVT leads (22.39% vs 19.45%). YTD: HVT leads (39.60% vs 33.77%). 1 year: HVT leads (51.04% vs 45.27%). Size (TRY): PRH leads (442.2M vs 435.3M). Investors: HVT leads (1,741 vs 159).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date HVT returned 39.60% and PRH returned 33.77%; over the last year HVT returned 51.04% and PRH returned 45.27%. Over the last month HVT returned 3.14% and PRH returned 1.75%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, HVT has a size of TRY 435.3M with 1,741 investors, while PRH has a size of TRY 442.2M with 159 investors. PRH leads in size and HVT leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of HVT is 1 out of 7 and that of PRH is 1. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.