GZZ vs IED Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GZZ (Garanti Portföy Finansal Teknolojiler Değişken Fon) and IED (İş Portföy Agresif Değişken Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GZZ | IED | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | — | −1.40% | −0.96% |
| Daily | −0.75% | −0.79% | −0.83% |
| 1 week | −2.73% | −1.76% | −0.98% |
| 1 month | −5.28% | −1.97% | −1.82% |
| 3 months | 1.26% | 3.16% | 3.78% |
| 6 months | 14.91% | — | 14.04% |
| YTD | 4.83% | 5.74% | 24.40% |
| 1 year | 12.08% | — | 34.17% |
| 3 years | 155.04% | — | 157.59% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GZZ vs IED Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of GZZ (Garanti Portföy Finansal Teknolojiler Değişken Fon) and IED (İş Portföy Agresif Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, GZZ leads in 3 and IED leads in 5. GZZ is a Variable Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; IED is a Variable Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: GZZ leads (−0.75% vs −0.79%). 1 week: IED leads (−1.76% vs −2.73%). 1 month: IED leads (−1.97% vs −5.28%). 3 months: IED leads (3.16% vs 1.26%). YTD: IED leads (5.74% vs 4.83%). Size (TRY): GZZ leads (60M vs 58.4M). Investors: IED leads (1,226 vs 1,174). Risk: GZZ leads (5 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, GZZ or IED?
Year to date GZZ returned 4.83% and IED returned 5.74%; over the last year GZZ returned 12.08% and IED returned —. Over the last month GZZ returned −5.28% and IED returned −1.97%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, GZZ or IED?
As of September 29, 2026, GZZ has a size of TRY 60M with 1,174 investors, while IED has a size of TRY 58.4M with 1,226 investors. GZZ leads in size and IED leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of GZZ and IED mean?
The CMB risk score of GZZ is 5 out of 7 and that of IED is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.