CHO vs GZZ Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of CHO (QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Atak Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GZZ (Garanti Portföy Finansal Teknolojiler Değişken Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | CHO | GZZ | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −1.04% | −0.75% | −0.83% |
| 1 week | −1.70% | −2.73% | −0.98% |
| 1 month | −2.99% | −5.28% | −1.82% |
| 3 months | 5.20% | 1.26% | 3.78% |
| 6 months | 13.01% | 14.91% | 14.04% |
| YTD | 20.35% | 4.83% | 24.40% |
| 1 year | 23.34% | 12.08% | 34.17% |
| 3 years | 166.46% | 155.04% | 157.59% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the CHO vs GZZ Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of CHO (QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Atak Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GZZ (Garanti Portföy Finansal Teknolojiler Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, CHO leads in 7 and GZZ leads in 4. CHO is a Variable Fund fund managed by QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; GZZ is a Variable Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: GZZ leads (−0.75% vs −1.04%). 1 week: CHO leads (−1.70% vs −2.73%). 1 month: CHO leads (−2.99% vs −5.28%). 3 months: CHO leads (5.20% vs 1.26%). 6 months: GZZ leads (14.91% vs 13.01%). YTD: CHO leads (20.35% vs 4.83%). 1 year: CHO leads (23.34% vs 12.08%). 3 years: CHO leads (166.46% vs 155.04%). Size (TRY): CHO leads (61.5M vs 60M). Investors: GZZ leads (1,174 vs 246). Risk: GZZ leads (5 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, CHO or GZZ?
Year to date CHO returned 20.35% and GZZ returned 4.83%; over the last year CHO returned 23.34% and GZZ returned 12.08%. Over the last month CHO returned −2.99% and GZZ returned −5.28%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, CHO or GZZ?
As of September 29, 2026, CHO has a size of TRY 61.5M with 246 investors, while GZZ has a size of TRY 60M with 1,174 investors. CHO leads in size and GZZ leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of CHO and GZZ mean?
The CMB risk score of CHO is 6 out of 7 and that of GZZ is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.