GZM vs MOZ Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GZM (Global MD Portföy Duru Serbest Fon) and MOZ (Emaa Blue Portföy Mozaik Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GZM | MOZ | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.38% | −0.27% | 0.09% |
| 1 week | 1.63% | 1.03% | 0.53% |
| 1 month | 4.74% | 1.20% | 0.00% |
| 3 months | 14.98% | 7.38% | 3.74% |
| 6 months | 37.20% | 19.22% | 9.91% |
| YTD | 73.15% | 24.89% | 15.04% |
| 1 year | 53.59% | — | 20.96% |
| 3 years | 50.96% | — | 107.79% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GZM vs MOZ Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of GZM (Global MD Portföy Duru Serbest Fon) and MOZ (Emaa Blue Portföy Mozaik Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 9, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, GZM leads in 8 and MOZ leads in 1. GZM is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Global MD Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; MOZ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Emaa Blue Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: GZM leads (0.38% vs −0.27%). 1 week: GZM leads (1.63% vs 1.03%). 1 month: GZM leads (4.74% vs 1.20%). 3 months: GZM leads (14.98% vs 7.38%). 6 months: GZM leads (37.20% vs 19.22%). YTD: GZM leads (73.15% vs 24.89%). Size (TRY): GZM leads (408.5M vs 394.8M). Investors: GZM leads (797 vs 95). Risk: MOZ leads (5 vs 7).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, GZM or MOZ?
Year to date GZM returned 73.15% and MOZ returned 24.89%; over the last year GZM returned 53.59% and MOZ returned —. Over the last month GZM returned 4.74% and MOZ returned 1.20%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, GZM or MOZ?
As of October 9, 2026, GZM has a size of TRY 408.5M with 797 investors, while MOZ has a size of TRY 394.8M with 95 investors. GZM leads in size and GZM leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of GZM and MOZ mean?
The CMB risk score of GZM is 7 out of 7 and that of MOZ is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.