Yatırımcı.AI

GZM vs MPN Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GZM (Global MD Portföy Duru Serbest Fon) and MPN (Aktif Portföy İkinci Aktif Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

GZMMPN
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GZM vs MPN Fund Comparison
MetricGZMMPNCategory median
Today (est.)0.86%—−0.74%
Daily0.38%−0.31%−0.07%
1 week1.29%−1.00%−0.29%
1 month4.56%−1.06%0.00%
3 months14.32%2.82%4.33%
6 months42.13%10.65%11.90%
YTD70.02%12.04%14.97%
1 year72.97%18.14%21.27%
3 years51.71%126.06%111.30%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Sep 29, 2026, 15:19.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GZM vs MPN Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GZM (Global MD Portföy Duru Serbest Fon) and MPN (Aktif Portföy İkinci Aktif Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, GZM leads in 8 and MPN leads in 2. GZM is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Global MD Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; MPN is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Aktif Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GZM leads (0.38% vs −0.31%). 1 week: GZM leads (1.29% vs −1.00%). 1 month: GZM leads (4.56% vs −1.06%). 3 months: GZM leads (14.32% vs 2.82%). 6 months: GZM leads (42.13% vs 10.65%). YTD: GZM leads (70.02% vs 12.04%). 1 year: GZM leads (72.97% vs 18.14%). 3 years: MPN leads (126.06% vs 51.71%). Size (TRY): MPN leads (335M vs 332.4M). Investors: GZM leads (684 vs 246).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GZM returned 70.02% and MPN returned 12.04%; over the last year GZM returned 72.97% and MPN returned 18.14%. Over the last month GZM returned 4.56% and MPN returned −1.06%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, GZM has a size of TRY 332.4M with 684 investors, while MPN has a size of TRY 335M with 246 investors. MPN leads in size and GZM leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GZM is 7 out of 7 and that of MPN is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.