Yatırımcı.AI

DUD vs MPN Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of DUD (Deniz Portföy Uzun Vadeli Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and MPN (Aktif Portföy İkinci Aktif Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

DUDMPN
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

DUD vs MPN Fund Comparison
MetricDUDMPNCategory median
Daily−1.40%−0.31%−0.07%
1 week−2.63%−1.00%−0.29%
1 month−3.03%−1.06%0.00%
3 months−0.36%2.82%4.33%
6 months14.47%10.65%11.90%
YTD10.94%12.04%14.97%
1 year20.66%18.14%21.27%
3 years—126.06%111.30%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the DUD vs MPN Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of DUD (Deniz Portföy Uzun Vadeli Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and MPN (Aktif Portföy İkinci Aktif Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, DUD leads in 2 and MPN leads in 7. DUD is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; MPN is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Aktif Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: MPN leads (−0.31% vs −1.40%). 1 week: MPN leads (−1.00% vs −2.63%). 1 month: MPN leads (−1.06% vs −3.03%). 3 months: MPN leads (2.82% vs −0.36%). 6 months: DUD leads (14.47% vs 10.65%). YTD: MPN leads (12.04% vs 10.94%). 1 year: DUD leads (20.66% vs 18.14%). Size (TRY): MPN leads (335M vs 328.9M). Investors: MPN leads (246 vs 237).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date DUD returned 10.94% and MPN returned 12.04%; over the last year DUD returned 20.66% and MPN returned 18.14%. Over the last month DUD returned −3.03% and MPN returned −1.06%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, DUD has a size of TRY 328.9M with 237 investors, while MPN has a size of TRY 335M with 246 investors. MPN leads in size and MPN leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of DUD is 6 out of 7 and that of MPN is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.