Yatırımcı.AI

GZM vs KRT Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GZM (Global MD Portföy Duru Serbest Fon) and KRT (Kare Portföy Türkiye Odaklı Serbest (Döviz ) Fon) side by side.

GZMKRT
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GZM vs KRT Fund Comparison
MetricGZMKRTCategory median
Daily0.03%0.20%0.20%
1 week1.04%0.40%0.47%
1 month4.24%2.40%1.35%
3 months13.96%5.22%3.70%
6 months34.00%11.79%8.84%
YTD77.60%18.74%16.33%
1 year67.48%22.78%20.23%
3 years66.89%110.66%103.91%
Returns are based on prices as of November 3, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GZM vs KRT Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GZM (Global MD Portföy Duru Serbest Fon) and KRT (Kare Portföy Türkiye Odaklı Serbest (Döviz ) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 3, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, GZM leads in 8 and KRT leads in 3. GZM is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Global MD Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; KRT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Kare Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: KRT leads (0.20% vs 0.03%). 1 week: GZM leads (1.04% vs 0.40%). 1 month: GZM leads (4.24% vs 2.40%). 3 months: GZM leads (13.96% vs 5.22%). 6 months: GZM leads (34.00% vs 11.79%). YTD: GZM leads (77.60% vs 18.74%). 1 year: GZM leads (67.48% vs 22.78%). 3 years: KRT leads (110.66% vs 66.89%). Size (TRY): GZM leads (548.6M vs 539.3M). Investors: GZM leads (881 vs 124). Risk: KRT leads (3 vs 7).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GZM returned 77.60% and KRT returned 18.74%; over the last year GZM returned 67.48% and KRT returned 22.78%. Over the last month GZM returned 4.24% and KRT returned 2.40%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 3, 2026, GZM has a size of TRY 548.6M with 881 investors, while KRT has a size of TRY 539.3M with 124 investors. GZM leads in size and GZM leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GZM is 7 out of 7 and that of KRT is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.