Yatırımcı.AI

GZM vs KRS Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GZM (Global MD Portföy Duru Serbest Fon) and KRS (Kare Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

GZMKRS
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GZM vs KRS Fund Comparison
MetricGZMKRSCategory median
Today (est.)0.38%—−0.07%
Daily0.03%0.35%0.20%
1 week1.04%0.19%0.47%
1 month4.24%0.20%1.35%
3 months13.96%4.64%3.70%
6 months34.00%8.84%8.84%
YTD77.60%15.00%16.33%
1 year67.48%17.69%20.23%
3 years66.89%130.54%103.91%
Returns are based on prices as of November 3, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Nov 3, 2026, 14:34.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GZM vs KRS Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GZM (Global MD Portföy Duru Serbest Fon) and KRS (Kare Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 3, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, GZM leads in 7 and KRS leads in 4. GZM is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Global MD Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; KRS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Kare Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: KRS leads (0.35% vs 0.03%). 1 week: GZM leads (1.04% vs 0.19%). 1 month: GZM leads (4.24% vs 0.20%). 3 months: GZM leads (13.96% vs 4.64%). 6 months: GZM leads (34.00% vs 8.84%). YTD: GZM leads (77.60% vs 15.00%). 1 year: GZM leads (67.48% vs 17.69%). 3 years: KRS leads (130.54% vs 66.89%). Size (TRY): KRS leads (552.5M vs 548.6M). Investors: GZM leads (881 vs 771). Risk: KRS leads (5 vs 7).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GZM returned 77.60% and KRS returned 15.00%; over the last year GZM returned 67.48% and KRS returned 17.69%. Over the last month GZM returned 4.24% and KRS returned 0.20%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 3, 2026, GZM has a size of TRY 548.6M with 881 investors, while KRS has a size of TRY 552.5M with 771 investors. KRS leads in size and GZM leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GZM is 7 out of 7 and that of KRS is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.