Yatırımcı.AI

GZM vs IHC Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GZM (Global MD Portföy Duru Serbest Fon) and IHC (Inveo Portföy Inter Serbest Fon) side by side.

GZMIHC
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GZM vs IHC Fund Comparison
MetricGZMIHCCategory median
Daily0.37%0.45%0.01%
1 week0.77%0.87%0.30%
1 month4.48%−2.30%0.00%
3 months13.99%0.99%3.96%
6 months35.72%9.68%8.18%
YTD75.41%37.55%15.73%
1 year73.94%37.69%20.69%
3 years71.93%209.09%105.65%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GZM vs IHC Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GZM (Global MD Portföy Duru Serbest Fon) and IHC (Inveo Portföy Inter Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, GZM leads in 7 and IHC leads in 4. GZM is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Global MD Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; IHC is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Inveo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: IHC leads (0.45% vs 0.37%). 1 week: IHC leads (0.87% vs 0.77%). 1 month: GZM leads (4.48% vs −2.30%). 3 months: GZM leads (13.99% vs 0.99%). 6 months: GZM leads (35.72% vs 9.68%). YTD: GZM leads (75.41% vs 37.55%). 1 year: GZM leads (73.94% vs 37.69%). 3 years: IHC leads (209.09% vs 71.93%). Size (TRY): GZM leads (539.7M vs 377.8M). Investors: GZM leads (922 vs 328). Risk: IHC leads (6 vs 7).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GZM returned 75.41% and IHC returned 37.55%; over the last year GZM returned 73.94% and IHC returned 37.69%. Over the last month GZM returned 4.48% and IHC returned −2.30%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, GZM has a size of TRY 539.7M with 922 investors, while IHC has a size of TRY 377.8M with 328 investors. GZM leads in size and GZM leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GZM is 7 out of 7 and that of IHC is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.