FFP vs GZJ Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FFP (QNB Portföy Fon Sepeti Fonu) and GZJ (Garanti Portföy İkinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | FFP | GZJ | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.81% | −0.68% | −0.81% |
| 1 week | −1.08% | −0.75% | −1.35% |
| 1 month | −1.51% | −1.52% | −1.46% |
| 3 months | 5.43% | 3.23% | 5.43% |
| 6 months | 10.06% | 11.70% | 13.12% |
| YTD | 16.17% | 19.65% | 21.52% |
| 1 year | 33.76% | 29.93% | 34.01% |
| 3 years | 189.84% | 188.67% | 172.01% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the FFP vs GZJ Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of FFP (QNB Portföy Fon Sepeti Fonu) and GZJ (Garanti Portföy İkinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FFP leads in 5 and GZJ leads in 5. FFP is a Fund of Funds fund managed by QNB Finans Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; GZJ is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: GZJ leads (−0.68% vs −0.81%). 1 week: GZJ leads (−0.75% vs −1.08%). 1 month: FFP leads (−1.51% vs −1.52%). 3 months: FFP leads (5.43% vs 3.23%). 6 months: GZJ leads (11.70% vs 10.06%). YTD: GZJ leads (19.65% vs 16.17%). 1 year: FFP leads (33.76% vs 29.93%). 3 years: FFP leads (189.84% vs 188.67%). Size (TRY): FFP leads (1.9B vs 1.7B). Investors: GZJ leads (4,945 vs 2,275).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, FFP or GZJ?
Year to date FFP returned 16.17% and GZJ returned 19.65%; over the last year FFP returned 33.76% and GZJ returned 29.93%. Over the last month FFP returned −1.51% and GZJ returned −1.52%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, FFP or GZJ?
As of September 29, 2026, FFP has a size of TRY 1.9B with 2,275 investors, while GZJ has a size of TRY 1.7B with 4,945 investors. FFP leads in size and GZJ leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of FFP and GZJ mean?
The CMB risk score of FFP is 4 out of 7 and that of GZJ is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.