Yatırımcı.AI

GZE vs ULH Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GZE (Garanti Portföy Emtia Serbest Fon) and ULH (Ünlü Portföy Onuncu Serbest Fon) side by side.

GZEULH
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GZE vs ULH Fund Comparison
MetricGZEULHCategory median
Daily−0.54%0.51%0.07%
1 week−0.62%1.32%0.51%
1 month−6.16%−4.16%1.66%
3 months0.31%−0.82%3.04%
6 months−0.87%1.44%8.17%
YTD22.42%15.81%17.49%
1 year32.39%19.88%21.23%
3 years142.09%180.44%105.57%
Returns are based on prices as of November 13, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GZE vs ULH Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GZE (Garanti Portföy Emtia Serbest Fon) and ULH (Ünlü Portföy Onuncu Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of November 13, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, GZE leads in 6 and ULH leads in 5. GZE is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ULH is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ünlü Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ULH leads (0.51% vs −0.54%). 1 week: ULH leads (1.32% vs −0.62%). 1 month: ULH leads (−4.16% vs −6.16%). 3 months: GZE leads (0.31% vs −0.82%). 6 months: ULH leads (1.44% vs −0.87%). YTD: GZE leads (22.42% vs 15.81%). 1 year: GZE leads (32.39% vs 19.88%). 3 years: ULH leads (180.44% vs 142.09%). Size (TRY): GZE leads (1.3B vs 1.2B). Investors: GZE leads (3,550 vs 205). Risk: GZE leads (6 vs 7).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GZE returned 22.42% and ULH returned 15.81%; over the last year GZE returned 32.39% and ULH returned 19.88%. Over the last month GZE returned −6.16% and ULH returned −4.16%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 13, 2026, GZE has a size of TRY 1.3B with 3,550 investors, while ULH has a size of TRY 1.2B with 205 investors. GZE leads in size and GZE leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GZE is 6 out of 7 and that of ULH is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.