Yatırımcı.AI

RS1 vs ULH Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of RS1 (Rota Portföy Birinci Kısa Vadeli Serbest Fon) and ULH (Ünlü Portföy Onuncu Serbest Fon) side by side.

RS1ULH
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

RS1 vs ULH Fund Comparison
MetricRS1ULHCategory median
Daily0.01%−1.91%0.01%
1 week0.53%−2.26%0.30%
1 month2.91%−4.47%0.00%
3 months9.90%2.16%3.96%
6 months21.54%6.20%8.18%
YTD36.94%16.41%15.73%
1 year47.67%17.55%20.69%
3 years—209.27%105.65%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the RS1 vs ULH Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of RS1 (Rota Portföy Birinci Kısa Vadeli Serbest Fon) and ULH (Ünlü Portföy Onuncu Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, RS1 leads in 9 and ULH leads in 1. RS1 is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ULH is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ünlü Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: RS1 leads (0.01% vs −1.91%). 1 week: RS1 leads (0.53% vs −2.26%). 1 month: RS1 leads (2.91% vs −4.47%). 3 months: RS1 leads (9.90% vs 2.16%). 6 months: RS1 leads (21.54% vs 6.20%). YTD: RS1 leads (36.94% vs 16.41%). 1 year: RS1 leads (47.67% vs 17.55%). Size (TRY): RS1 leads (1.3B vs 1.2B). Investors: ULH leads (210 vs 147). Risk: RS1 leads (2 vs 7).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date RS1 returned 36.94% and ULH returned 16.41%; over the last year RS1 returned 47.67% and ULH returned 17.55%. Over the last month RS1 returned 2.91% and ULH returned −4.47%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, RS1 has a size of TRY 1.3B with 147 investors, while ULH has a size of TRY 1.2B with 210 investors. RS1 leads in size and ULH leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of RS1 is 2 out of 7 and that of ULH is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.