GUK vs RS1 Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GUK (Garanti Portföy Gümüş Katılım Serbest Fon) and RS1 (Rota Portföy Birinci Kısa Vadeli Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GUK | RS1 | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.85% | −1.87% | 0.06% |
| 1 week | 0.72% | −1.29% | 0.56% |
| 1 month | −11.49% | 0.57% | 1.84% |
| 3 months | −14.79% | 7.19% | 3.29% |
| 6 months | −31.26% | 18.52% | 7.90% |
| YTD | −21.82% | 36.48% | 17.53% |
| 1 year | 13.59% | 43.99% | 21.48% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GUK vs RS1 Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of GUK (Garanti Portföy Gümüş Katılım Serbest Fon) and RS1 (Rota Portföy Birinci Kısa Vadeli Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, GUK leads in 3 and RS1 leads in 7. GUK is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RS1 is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: GUK leads (0.85% vs −1.87%). 1 week: GUK leads (0.72% vs −1.29%). 1 month: RS1 leads (0.57% vs −11.49%). 3 months: RS1 leads (7.19% vs −14.79%). 6 months: RS1 leads (18.52% vs −31.26%). YTD: RS1 leads (36.48% vs −21.82%). 1 year: RS1 leads (43.99% vs 13.59%). Size (TRY): RS1 leads (1.2B vs 1.2B). Investors: GUK leads (2,268 vs 132). Risk: RS1 leads (2 vs 7).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, GUK or RS1?
Year to date GUK returned −21.82% and RS1 returned 36.48%; over the last year GUK returned 13.59% and RS1 returned 43.99%. Over the last month GUK returned −11.49% and RS1 returned 0.57%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, GUK or RS1?
As of November 12, 2026, GUK has a size of TRY 1.2B with 2,268 investors, while RS1 has a size of TRY 1.2B with 132 investors. RS1 leads in size and GUK leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of GUK and RS1 mean?
The CMB risk score of GUK is 7 out of 7 and that of RS1 is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.