Yatırımcı.AI

GUK vs YPF Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GUK (Garanti Portföy Gümüş Katılım Serbest Fon) and YPF (Yapı Kredi Portföy Alfa Serbest Fon) side by side.

GUKYPF
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GUK vs YPF Fund Comparison
MetricGUKYPFCategory median
Daily0.85%0.10%0.06%
1 week0.72%0.52%0.56%
1 month−11.49%−1.57%1.84%
3 months−14.79%1.29%3.29%
6 months−31.26%6.69%7.90%
YTD−21.82%34.33%17.53%
1 year13.59%42.35%21.48%
3 years—150.75%105.66%
Returns are based on prices as of November 12, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GUK vs YPF Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GUK (Garanti Portföy Gümüş Katılım Serbest Fon) and YPF (Yapı Kredi Portföy Alfa Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, GUK leads in 3 and YPF leads in 7. GUK is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; YPF is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GUK leads (0.85% vs 0.10%). 1 week: GUK leads (0.72% vs 0.52%). 1 month: YPF leads (−1.57% vs −11.49%). 3 months: YPF leads (1.29% vs −14.79%). 6 months: YPF leads (6.69% vs −31.26%). YTD: YPF leads (34.33% vs −21.82%). 1 year: YPF leads (42.35% vs 13.59%). Size (TRY): YPF leads (1.2B vs 1.2B). Investors: GUK leads (2,268 vs 491). Risk: YPF leads (5 vs 7).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GUK returned −21.82% and YPF returned 34.33%; over the last year GUK returned 13.59% and YPF returned 42.35%. Over the last month GUK returned −11.49% and YPF returned −1.57%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 12, 2026, GUK has a size of TRY 1.2B with 2,268 investors, while YPF has a size of TRY 1.2B with 491 investors. YPF leads in size and GUK leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GUK is 7 out of 7 and that of YPF is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.