Yatırımcı.AI

GPU vs VVU Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GPU (Garanti Portföy Üçüncü Değişken Fon) and VVU (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Dinamik Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

GPUVVU
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GPU vs VVU Fund Comparison
MetricGPUVVUCategory median
Daily−1.32%−1.77%−1.35%
1 week−2.34%−3.61%−2.09%
1 month−3.40%−5.20%−4.70%
3 months0.36%−0.92%−1.44%
6 months4.91%1.96%2.69%
YTD21.41%27.83%20.04%
1 year30.15%36.87%28.83%
3 years202.85%176.63%156.52%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GPU vs VVU Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GPU (Garanti Portföy Üçüncü Değişken Fon) and VVU (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Dinamik Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, GPU leads in 7 and VVU leads in 4. GPU is a Variable Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; VVU is a Variable Fund fund managed by AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GPU leads (−1.32% vs −1.77%). 1 week: GPU leads (−2.34% vs −3.61%). 1 month: GPU leads (−3.40% vs −5.20%). 3 months: GPU leads (0.36% vs −0.92%). 6 months: GPU leads (4.91% vs 1.96%). YTD: VVU leads (27.83% vs 21.41%). 1 year: VVU leads (36.87% vs 30.15%). 3 years: GPU leads (202.85% vs 176.63%). Size (TRY): VVU leads (345M vs 329.9M). Investors: VVU leads (5,612 vs 2,281). Risk: GPU leads (4 vs 5).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GPU returned 21.41% and VVU returned 27.83%; over the last year GPU returned 30.15% and VVU returned 36.87%. Over the last month GPU returned −3.40% and VVU returned −5.20%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, GPU has a size of TRY 329.9M with 2,281 investors, while VVU has a size of TRY 345M with 5,612 investors. VVU leads in size and VVU leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GPU is 4 out of 7 and that of VVU is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.