Yatırımcı.AI

GHZ vs VVU Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GHZ (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Temkinli Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and VVU (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Dinamik Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

GHZVVU
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GHZ vs VVU Fund Comparison
MetricGHZVVUCategory median
Daily0.09%−0.86%−0.41%
1 week0.70%−1.75%−1.69%
1 month2.84%−3.81%−3.34%
3 months8.95%1.28%0.00%
6 months19.19%3.81%4.10%
YTD32.65%30.14%21.58%
1 year42.07%40.32%30.90%
3 years199.70%181.63%160.42%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GHZ vs VVU Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GHZ (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Temkinli Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and VVU (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Dinamik Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, GHZ leads in 10 and VVU leads in 1. GHZ is a Variable Fund fund managed by Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; VVU is a Variable Fund fund managed by AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GHZ leads (0.09% vs −0.86%). 1 week: GHZ leads (0.70% vs −1.75%). 1 month: GHZ leads (2.84% vs −3.81%). 3 months: GHZ leads (8.95% vs 1.28%). 6 months: GHZ leads (19.19% vs 3.81%). YTD: GHZ leads (32.65% vs 30.14%). 1 year: GHZ leads (42.07% vs 40.32%). 3 years: GHZ leads (199.70% vs 181.63%). Size (TRY): VVU leads (351.6M vs 344.5M). Investors: GHZ leads (7,640 vs 5,619). Risk: GHZ leads (2 vs 5).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GHZ returned 32.65% and VVU returned 30.14%; over the last year GHZ returned 42.07% and VVU returned 40.32%. Over the last month GHZ returned 2.84% and VVU returned −3.81%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, GHZ has a size of TRY 344.5M with 7,640 investors, while VVU has a size of TRY 351.6M with 5,619 investors. VVU leads in size and GHZ leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GHZ is 2 out of 7 and that of VVU is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.