Yatırımcı.AI

GPU vs HHN Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GPU (Garanti Portföy Üçüncü Değişken Fon) and HHN (Türkiye Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Katılım Dinamik Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

GPUHHN
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GPU vs HHN Fund Comparison
MetricGPUHHNCategory median
Daily−1.32%1.08%−1.35%
1 week−2.34%5.11%−2.09%
1 month−3.40%4.03%−4.70%
3 months0.36%15.45%−1.44%
6 months4.91%14.08%2.69%
YTD21.41%24.11%20.04%
1 year30.15%40.44%28.83%
3 years202.85%295.23%156.52%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GPU vs HHN Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GPU (Garanti Portföy Üçüncü Değişken Fon) and HHN (Türkiye Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Katılım Dinamik Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, GPU leads in 2 and HHN leads in 9. GPU is a Variable Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; HHN is a Variable Fund fund managed by Türkiye Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: HHN leads (1.08% vs −1.32%). 1 week: HHN leads (5.11% vs −2.34%). 1 month: HHN leads (4.03% vs −3.40%). 3 months: HHN leads (15.45% vs 0.36%). 6 months: HHN leads (14.08% vs 4.91%). YTD: HHN leads (24.11% vs 21.41%). 1 year: HHN leads (40.44% vs 30.15%). 3 years: HHN leads (295.23% vs 202.85%). Size (TRY): GPU leads (329.9M vs 315.9M). Investors: HHN leads (12,026 vs 2,281). Risk: GPU leads (4 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GPU returned 21.41% and HHN returned 24.11%; over the last year GPU returned 30.15% and HHN returned 40.44%. Over the last month GPU returned −3.40% and HHN returned 4.03%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, GPU has a size of TRY 329.9M with 2,281 investors, while HHN has a size of TRY 315.9M with 12,026 investors. GPU leads in size and HHN leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GPU is 4 out of 7 and that of HHN is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.