Yatırımcı.AI

GPU vs SGT Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GPU (Garanti Portföy Üçüncü Değişken Fon) and SGT (Garanti Portföy Siber Güvenlik Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) side by side.

GPUSGT
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GPU vs SGT Fund Comparison
MetricGPUSGTCategory median
Daily0.72%3.16%0.03%
1 week0.80%0.59%0.83%
1 month−0.67%−7.03%−1.16%
3 months1.17%0.56%−0.11%
6 months4.43%24.01%0.00%
YTD23.78%47.70%22.14%
1 year31.13%46.51%29.37%
3 years201.58%—154.49%
Returns are based on prices as of November 12, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GPU vs SGT Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GPU (Garanti Portföy Üçüncü Değişken Fon) and SGT (Garanti Portföy Siber Güvenlik Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, GPU leads in 5 and SGT leads in 5. GPU is a Variable Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; SGT is a Variable Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: SGT leads (3.16% vs 0.72%). 1 week: GPU leads (0.80% vs 0.59%). 1 month: GPU leads (−0.67% vs −7.03%). 3 months: GPU leads (1.17% vs 0.56%). 6 months: SGT leads (24.01% vs 4.43%). YTD: SGT leads (47.70% vs 23.78%). 1 year: SGT leads (46.51% vs 31.13%). Size (TRY): GPU leads (327M vs 315M). Investors: SGT leads (3,314 vs 2,242). Risk: GPU leads (4 vs 5).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GPU returned 23.78% and SGT returned 47.70%; over the last year GPU returned 31.13% and SGT returned 46.51%. Over the last month GPU returned −0.67% and SGT returned −7.03%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 12, 2026, GPU has a size of TRY 327M with 2,242 investors, while SGT has a size of TRY 315M with 3,314 investors. GPU leads in size and SGT leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GPU is 4 out of 7 and that of SGT is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.