ACD vs GPU Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ACD (İstanbul Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) and GPU (Garanti Portföy Üçüncü Değişken Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | ACD | GPU | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | −1.18% | — | −1.85% |
| Daily | 0.07% | 0.55% | 0.32% |
| 1 week | −0.83% | 0.53% | 0.42% |
| 1 month | −3.24% | −0.68% | −1.48% |
| 3 months | 0.75% | 5.03% | 4.48% |
| 6 months | 16.19% | 14.85% | 14.82% |
| YTD | 24.08% | 25.33% | 25.33% |
| 1 year | 29.85% | 36.42% | 35.72% |
| 3 years | 159.75% | 214.55% | 161.05% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the ACD vs GPU Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of ACD (İstanbul Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) and GPU (Garanti Portföy Üçüncü Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, ACD leads in 1 and GPU leads in 10. ACD is a Variable Fund fund managed by İstanbul Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; GPU is a Variable Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: GPU leads (0.55% vs 0.07%). 1 week: GPU leads (0.53% vs −0.83%). 1 month: GPU leads (−0.68% vs −3.24%). 3 months: GPU leads (5.03% vs 0.75%). 6 months: ACD leads (16.19% vs 14.85%). YTD: GPU leads (25.33% vs 24.08%). 1 year: GPU leads (36.42% vs 29.85%). 3 years: GPU leads (214.55% vs 159.75%). Size (TRY): GPU leads (353.5M vs 341M). Investors: GPU leads (2,380 vs 1,375). Risk: GPU leads (4 vs 5).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, ACD or GPU?
Year to date ACD returned 24.08% and GPU returned 25.33%; over the last year ACD returned 29.85% and GPU returned 36.42%. Over the last month ACD returned −3.24% and GPU returned −0.68%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, ACD or GPU?
As of September 28, 2026, ACD has a size of TRY 341M with 1,375 investors, while GPU has a size of TRY 353.5M with 2,380 investors. GPU leads in size and GPU leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of ACD and GPU mean?
The CMB risk score of ACD is 5 out of 7 and that of GPU is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.