Yatırımcı.AI

FSR vs NLK Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FSR (Fiba Portföy İkinci Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) and NLK (Nurol Portföy Kısa Vadeli Serbest Fon) side by side.

FSRNLK
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

FSR vs NLK Fund Comparison
MetricFSRNLKCategory median
Daily0.19%0.31%0.19%
1 week−0.32%0.72%0.42%
1 month−0.43%3.24%0.94%
3 months5.72%10.33%5.89%
6 months9.97%22.42%12.86%
YTD12.39%34.05%18.07%
1 year17.34%48.93%24.44%
3 years17.30%—111.64%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the FSR vs NLK comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FSR (Fiba Portföy İkinci Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) and NLK (Nurol Portföy Kısa Vadeli Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FSR leads in 2 and NLK leads in 8. FSR is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NLK is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Nurol Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: NLK leads (0.31% vs 0.19%). 1 week: NLK leads (0.72% vs −0.32%). 1 month: NLK leads (3.24% vs −0.43%). 3 months: NLK leads (10.33% vs 5.72%). 6 months: NLK leads (22.42% vs 9.97%). YTD: NLK leads (34.05% vs 12.39%). 1 year: NLK leads (48.93% vs 17.34%). Size (TRY): NLK leads (6.1B vs 5.9B). Investors: FSR leads (2,382 vs 840). Risk: FSR leads (0 vs 1).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date FSR returned 12.39% and NLK returned 34.05%; over the last year FSR returned 17.34% and NLK returned 48.93%. Over the last month FSR returned −0.43% and NLK returned 3.24%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, FSR has a size of TRY 5.9B with 2,382 investors, while NLK has a size of TRY 6.1B with 840 investors. NLK leads in size and FSR leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FSR is 0 out of 7 and that of NLK is 1. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.