Yatırımcı.AI

FSG vs GMI Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FSG (Fiba Portföy Birinci Hisse Senedi Serbest Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and GMI (Ak Portföy Gümüş Serbest Fon) side by side.

FSGGMI
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FSG vs GMI Fund Comparison
MetricFSGGMICategory median
Today (est.)−3.21%—−2.71%
Daily−1.78%0.43%0.05%
1 week−3.65%−5.72%0.44%
1 month−8.09%−12.42%0.38%
3 months−6.53%0.25%3.95%
6 months−7.26%−22.57%8.45%
YTD11.93%−16.66%16.06%
1 year19.45%—20.98%
3 years95.38%—107.86%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Oct 22, 2026, 21:42.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FSG vs GMI Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FSG (Fiba Portföy Birinci Hisse Senedi Serbest Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and GMI (Ak Portföy Gümüş Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, FSG leads in 5 and GMI leads in 4. FSG is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; GMI is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GMI leads (0.43% vs −1.78%). 1 week: FSG leads (−3.65% vs −5.72%). 1 month: FSG leads (−8.09% vs −12.42%). 3 months: GMI leads (0.25% vs −6.53%). 6 months: FSG leads (−7.26% vs −22.57%). YTD: FSG leads (11.93% vs −16.66%). Size (TRY): GMI leads (557.1M vs 548.8M). Investors: GMI leads (4,695 vs 651). Risk: FSG leads (6 vs 7).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FSG returned 11.93% and GMI returned −16.66%; over the last year FSG returned 19.45% and GMI returned —. Over the last month FSG returned −8.09% and GMI returned −12.42%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, FSG has a size of TRY 548.8M with 651 investors, while GMI has a size of TRY 557.1M with 4,695 investors. GMI leads in size and GMI leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FSG is 6 out of 7 and that of GMI is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.