FBV vs PPS Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FBV (İş Portföy Model Serbest Fon) and PPS (Phillip Portföy Birinci Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | FBV | PPS | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.26% | −3.18% | 0.05% |
| 1 week | −0.88% | 6.86% | 0.44% |
| 1 month | −6.42% | 8.00% | 0.38% |
| 3 months | −2.42% | 13.83% | 3.95% |
| 6 months | −1.08% | −4.73% | 8.45% |
| YTD | 17.19% | 5.18% | 16.06% |
| 1 year | 24.23% | 10.28% | 20.98% |
| 3 years | 205.96% | 199.15% | 107.86% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the FBV vs PPS Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of FBV (İş Portföy Model Serbest Fon) and PPS (Phillip Portföy Birinci Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, FBV leads in 8 and PPS leads in 3. FBV is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PPS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Phillip Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: FBV leads (0.26% vs −3.18%). 1 week: PPS leads (6.86% vs −0.88%). 1 month: PPS leads (8.00% vs −6.42%). 3 months: PPS leads (13.83% vs −2.42%). 6 months: FBV leads (−1.08% vs −4.73%). YTD: FBV leads (17.19% vs 5.18%). 1 year: FBV leads (24.23% vs 10.28%). 3 years: FBV leads (205.96% vs 199.15%). Size (TRY): FBV leads (553.6M vs 553.3M). Investors: FBV leads (1,627 vs 1,482). Risk: FBV leads (6 vs 7).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, FBV or PPS?
Year to date FBV returned 17.19% and PPS returned 5.18%; over the last year FBV returned 24.23% and PPS returned 10.28%. Over the last month FBV returned −6.42% and PPS returned 8.00%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, FBV or PPS?
As of October 22, 2026, FBV has a size of TRY 553.6M with 1,627 investors, while PPS has a size of TRY 553.3M with 1,482 investors. FBV leads in size and FBV leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of FBV and PPS mean?
The CMB risk score of FBV is 6 out of 7 and that of PPS is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.